Veraison: from berry growth to berry ripening.

Veraison: from berry growth to berry ripening.

Sunday, May 27, 2012

How To Pair Food And Wine

Food and wine pairing continues to be a lively topic. There are books and Internet sites that are 100% devoted to the pursuit of the perfect match, and each proclaims its latest insight, recommendation and/or discovery. It was not always so, of course. Before globalization and the resultant world-wide availability of wine, people ate the food that was locally grown and washed it down with whatever wine they or their neighbors produced. It was sustenance’s natural law. Moreover, one ate and drank to survive, and it didn’t matter if the pairing hit his or her hedonistic hotspots.

Fast forward to today, and things are quite different. Cassoulet, that rustic, peasant dish from southwestern France was usually sided with the local, dark-as-night Cahors. Now, one can substitute a California Zinfandel or an Australian Shiraz. Similarly, Alsatians often enjoyed their rich, communal Choucroute Garni with Riesling or Pinot Gris. Currently, any crisp oak free, white from just about anywhere will suffice. And who would have thought that authentic Sashimi would ever be on the Sushi counter next to a Spanish Cava or similar sparkling wine?

Globalization, of course, is the key to those transformations, but I think the answer lies—at least partially—elsewhere. While many still regard food and drink as a “fuel stop” to satisfy the hunger and slake the thirst, there is now a sizeable group of food and wine enthusiasts who see it differently. They don’t simply eat, they dine. They don’t just swallow, they savor. Enjoying food and wine is a gastronomic experience that gratifies the intellect just as much as it satisfies the basic human need for nourishment. Let’s take a look at a couple ways one can approach and/or realize this near-spiritual state of mind.

One can adopt the method utilized by Sommeliers and other high priests of food and wine matrimony. In reaching their recommendation, they claim for the perfect union to occur there should be a synergistic coupling, (complementary or contrasting), of the parallel components (acidity, sweetness, bitterness) of both the food and the wine. This wedded bliss first takes into consideration the wine’s style and structural components and then, second, relates those details to the recipe’s style (casual or upscale) and mode of preparation (braising, grilling, etc.). After contemplating all those particulars, the perfect match is selected. While that elite group has the wine and culinary proficiency to solve that equation, the rest of us simply don’t. So, let’s look at another approach for pairing of food and wine.

A more user-friendly method involves what I call “the modern update” of an ancient maxim: “Red wine with red meat, white wine with white meat, fish and poultry.” Don’t chortle, because that old adage really is a good starting point. Red meat, with its rich, abundant texture and customary methods of preparation, virtually always points to red wine, while fish and poultry, with their delicate flesh and smaller scaled preparations, often can be enjoyed with many white wines. (Veal and pork, however, occupy an interesting middle ground.)

Food and wine enthusiasts have learned to modernize that time-worn maxim by looking beyond the primary ingredient (chicken, beef, etc) and focusing on the recipe’s most dominant or expressive flavors. In and of itself, the flavor/taste spectrum of a recipe’s main ingredient typically is rather narrow, and it normally requires the addition of flavor-enhancing ingredients to highlight its role in the recipe as well as to broaden its versatility. Beyond salt and pepper, those savory aspects emanate from, and are typically characterized by, an almost limitless range of aromatic and flavoring alternatives: herbs and spices, fresh and dried; sauces, salsas and gravies; rubs and marinades; fruits, vegetables and their juices; olive and other fruit and nut oils; wines and vinegars; and creams, yogurts and cheeses just to name a few! The pairing should focus on those particulars, not the primary ingredient.

Take chicken for example; or veal, pork or other “white-wine-only foods.” Depending on how each is cooked, spiced, sauced and finished, any number of red or white wines could be acceptable partners. If, say, sautéed in olive oil and finished with capers, green olives and artichokes, the dominant flavors, and palatal effect, point to something like Sauvignon Blanc, Spain’s Verdejo and similar oak-free white wines with a lively profile that will stand up to those components. However, if braised with onions, garlic, mushrooms, thyme, bacon bits and a splash of beef broth, this rich, earthy combination virtually begs for an inexpensive, full-bodied red like Côtes du Rhône, Rioja Crianza or Nebbiolo d’Alba. And how about if alternately sautéed with a splash of walnut oil, a tad of balsamic vinegar and a few tablespoons of minced apricots? Hmmm? What say you?

In closing, even though the Sommelier method is more precise and may arrive at a more perfect match, “the modern update” is less complicated and, thereby, offers the freedom to explore many cross cultural options. Both of those, however, must give way to personal preferences, no matter how narrow they may be. However, while one certainly should drink whatever one wants, there are many recipes and modes of cooking that beg for a particular style of wine, and that rather implies the willingness to pour something other than one’s favorite Chardonnay or White Zinfandel.






























Sunday, May 6, 2012

Structure -- The Anatomy Of Wine


I often take wine to restaurants, and if its quality warrants it, I like to share it with one or more of the employees. Recently my wife and I went to our favorite Italian restaurant, and being in the mood for something special, I took a 1997 Flaccianello, an exceptional Italian wine that ranks high in that unofficial classification of “Super Tuscans.”

Our food server gave the wine an ecstatic two thumbs up, but I was curious how the Chef—born and trained in Italy—might react to it. Smiling broadly and carefully examining the bottle between swirls and sips, he was also quite taken by it. Among his several positive assessments, and the one on which we both agreed, was the wine’s excellent structure—a special quality that made it vibrant and delicious even after all these years.

For people not into wine, the notion of structure may smack of pretense. For them, wine is simply wine—one of many beverages to accompany food. However, for those who are more than casual wine drinkers—informed wine enthusiasts—that notion underlies their buying habits. For the former, it’s a notion worth exploring. For the latter, it underlies what they buy and why.

Structure, from a tasting perspective, is the vehicle or means by which a wine achieves its impact on your palate. Structure’s major components that create the effect are alcohol, residual sugar, acid, and tannins. Alcohol provides the body and feeling of weight in your mouth (light, medium, full). Residual sugar, that portion not completely fermented into alcohol, is what determines how sweet or dry a wine tastes.

Acidity (pleasant tartness) is a most vital component, especially for whites. It provides a crisp, lasting finish, as well as the ability to age and improve. Tannins (think black tea) are mainly from red grapes but also from stems, seeds and oak and give a wine a feeling of substance and texture, as well as its ability to evolve for years. Those four, acting in unison, are what comprises a wine’s makeup and make you aware there is something far more than colorful liquid in your mouth.

So, when and how do we identify and describe a wine’s structure? After getting a handle on its appearance and aromatics, flavor and finish, you are totally armed with all you need to next judge and describe its structure. If it feels lifeless and flabby on your palate, the wine is said to be poorly structured. It is likely short on acidity or tannin (or both).

Poorly structured wines can also be described as being unbalanced or out of balance, especially those with an excess of acidity or tannins (or residual sugar). An overly acidic white (or red ) wine can taste unpleasantly citric or sour, just as the astringency of a tannic red wine can jolt the palate with its abrasiveness. Unbalanced wines are easy to perceive—something disagreeable is dominant. (Think vinaigrette with too much vinegar or too much salt.)

As you likely can guess, wines with good structure have all four elements in perfect combination. Everything is in balance, with neither acidity nor tannins prevailing. They deliver a significant and pleasing palate impression, and are a joy to drink.

Wines with great or excellent structure, however, are in a class of their own. While “approachable” in their youth, some ageing is usually required to really discover and enjoy their best qualities. When evolved, all parts will be integrated and harmoniously balanced. Their appearance will be clear and brilliant, and aromatics and flavors will entice and amaze. They will be complex wines with depth, concentration and vitality, and—more often than not—coming from time-proven, high quality winegrowers and appellations.

Even though they may challenge the purse as well as the palate, these wines—and they run the entire gamut of red, white, sparkling and dessert—certainly deserve a place on your “World Class Wines to Try” bucket list. To paraphrase the Michelin travel guides, “They are wines worth seeking out.”